Agree or Disagree Essay

It is argued that governments should allocate more funds to railways instead of roads. However, I disagree with this idea, as I believe that roads are more essential due to their accessibility, lower costs, and contribution to economic growth.

One major reason that roads should receive more funding is their accessibility. Unlike railways, which are often limited to certain regions, roads can be built almost anywhere, serving both urban and rural areas. This means roads connect people to essential services, jobs, and schools, regardless of where they live. For example, in many rural parts of the world, roads are the only form of transportation, whereas railways might not reach these areas due to the high cost of building tracks. Therefore, investing in roads ensures that more people have access to the services they need, which railways alone cannot guarantee.

Another important factor is the lower cost of building and maintaining roads compared to railways. Roads are generally cheaper to construct and maintain than railways. While railways require expensive tracks, stations, and special equipment, roads can be constructed using more accessible and affordable materials. This makes roads a more practical investment, especially in developing regions. For instance, many countries have improved their road infrastructure at a fraction of the cost of building new railway lines, which can be prohibitively expensive. Additionally, roads facilitate the movement of goods and services, which directly contributes to economic growth. Thus, prioritizing road infrastructure helps boost the economy while keeping costs manageable for the government.

To conclude, I firmly believe that roads should be prioritized due to their wider accessibility and lower costs.